Luohe Court that the two sides a point of contention is the amount of withdrawal problems. Each of the notes for the 100 requirement mens north face denali jacket, only the cash income of the bank's internal inventory of standard and sealed, but the banking system's internal regulations, the banking system only work within the normative role of cashier. Cash paid to savers count must be face to face, and face amount of the inventory shall prevail. Although the savings bank staff to be able to confirm Hemou 6 sealed cash, but can not confirm the exact cash payment to each is 100, it can not be identified when cash is received Hemou $ 50,000. Filled out from the withdrawals and savings withdrawal slip running account of the internal record, can confirm Hemou removed 40,000.
Yang Dacheng He believes that banks and savings depositors is a contractual relationship between the If bank depositors without permission, planning to go from depositor funds in the account womens north face denali jacket, not only violated the contract, and violation of property rights of depositors.
view and Commander: Can the are But if the banks could give the customer money, the customer can use The legal profession that north face clearance, if understood as absolute If interpreted as
11 14, Anke find their bank accounts suddenly lose a million. button to go? If so, depositors still feel safe?
Liaoning: a short section of bank deposits was sentenced to ten thousand yuan plan to go depositors lost
Tanglin district court held that: Chen banks claim to pay $ 10,000, but the bank's video surveillance video can not conclude that banks Chuxu Yuan handed the teller's specific delivery of money, which is now no evidence Chen proved to take on more of the deposit of $ 10,000. Banks should return 10,000 yuan Chen. (Shenyang Daily)
Anke decided to have a say, then the people's court to Jiaocheng, requiring banks to return secretly planning to go to $ 10,000, the current Court has been filed. The branch of a bank Ningde relevant responsible person said, in the prosecution of Ms. Ho, the banks also filed a counterclaim that Ms. Ho unjust enrichment.
But the next development, Ms. Ho is clearly contrary to expectations.
the branch confirmed the plan on the account from Anke walked a million. Relevant responsible person said, she serves withdraw money left the bank, the staff found a small settlement of a million, through the surveillance video, that is due to the negligence of the teller, Madam Ho give the $ 10,000, so I want her to have this the money. Notice to the other banks on several occasions to be with, but not with each other, the bank according to banking rules and regulations, to make a deposit account equal to freeze, and eventually received the money deducted.
2005 In March, Henan Wuyang Luohe staff of a bank as a depositor for complete withdrawal business, find a short paragraph 1 million, that this name is more to depositors, and to beg his. Both sides in court. Luohe City Intermediate People's Court made the final decision, dismissed the bank's claim.
Previously, the bank told the media that has entered the judicial process, court decisions and other circumstances can only be a further response, surveillance video as evidence in court will provide the view temporarily.
relevant case
Henan: a short section of ten thousand yuan sue bank depositors against unjust enrichment against
Fuzhou Century Law Firm
under the unnecessary disputes and troubles. However, there is evidence that there is an error during the transaction in the case (surveillance video), that evidence, and this time use the (Money later)
Yang Dacheng also said that the key is to be paid directly to the bank can confirm that Ms Ho 4 million. If the surveillance video clearly records the staff out of 40,000 yuan directly to Miss Fu Jihe, such as the face value of $ 100 RMB no dismantled, Seals intact, binding firm, and the thickness of the same, shall be deemed that each of the 100 each to $ 10,000, can be used as evidence.
Ningde branch of a bank that bank depositors Anke took more than $ 10,000 in two months, without permission will draw the money on her account to go ten thousand. Ms. Ho is this the line to court, and the branch then filed a countersuit that Ms. Ho is unjust enrichment. Currently, the local court has accepted the case.
lawyer said: banking practices breach of contract tort
mutual bank depositors report
2007, the Shenyang bank to pay a bank identified a depositor of $ 10,000 and took out the video as evidence, but also planning to go to the depositors 10,000 yuan deposit. Depositors of the bank to court. Dongling District People's Court of Shenyang to provide video evidence that banks pay depositors shall not identified, should be deducted $ 10,000 to return the depositors.
from Anke provided on the line to see this record book, September 10 this year, Ms. Ho to two accounts to access records mens north face denali, a withdrawal of $ 30,000, a deposit 29,600 yuan .
Ningde city, who lives near New Asia Plaza, Ms Ho said, September 10, 0900, she was eight hundred fifteen middle Ningde After this post, holding the book to the nearest branch of the operating room withdrawals. She proposed to the bank teller window to get 3 million in cash, and pretty soon, she serves as usual, took the book and cash, the bag will be placed within the home. Afternoon, from 3 million in cash she was out of the four Bai Yuanchao to cover everyday household, after which the remaining 29,600 yuan deposited in the bank near his home Dongqiao branch.
I was clearly told her not to take more.
(China Court News)
not see ten thousand yuan
trial, the two sides on the bank to pay the 7 or 8 bundles of yuan tie dispute. Bank of the evidence that the overpayment is surveillance video. But after China Criminal Police College of the video identification, the conclusion can not conclude that banks Chu Xuyuan pay for the depositor handed the whole bundle of money is 7 or 8 bundles of bundles.
million deposit was planning to go
Related articles: